An Ideological Straitjacket
Home
The World's Best
The Productivity Puzzle
What Is The Point of a Coalition If Only One Voice Is Heard?
Standing Up for Ourselves
Leaning Against the Market
A New Labour Leadership
Wealthy Individuals Do Not Hold the Key to a Stronger Economy
The Election the Parties Lost But the Country Won
They Might As Well Be In Zhejiang Province
The Real Story of the 2010 Election
Don't Be Frightened of a Hung Parliament
Obama's Health Care Bill and the British General Election
Obama's Health Care Bill and the British General Election
A Matter of Luck?
Joy In Heaven - A Sinner Repents
Equality Matters
There Are Other Options
Remembering The Holocaust
A False Dichotomy
Macro Economic Policy Is What Counts
Tony Blair's War
Labour's Coup
The Macro Economy Is What Matters
We Owe the Brash Task Force A Debt of Gratitude
The All Blacks - Just Another Team?
Closing the Gap
Bryan Gould Speaks to UNESCO
What's Left for Labour?
Learning the Lessons
What the Meltdown Tells Us About Markets
Bonuses - for Good or Ill?
Who Controls The Banks?
Gordon Is Right This Time
The Productivity "Puzzle"
A Tale of Two Decades
Sin and the City
Too Late for Complacency
Tragedy
It Has Come To This
New Labour Betrays Its Supporters
A Standard and Poor Budget
The Country Not The Government Should Be The Budget Priority
The Expense of New Labour
Step Forward Unesco
Governments and Markets
Governments As Banks
Constructing A Left Politics
Spend Now, Prosper Later
Filthy Rich
Who Is To Blame?
Treasury Must Look Past Interest Rates To Boost Economy
Wanted - Directors Who Think
Not In My Name
When The Facts Change
An Ideological Straitjacket
Lessons from the Crisis
Saving Labour
Fiscal Stimulus? Not Quite
Politics Not Economics
Open Letter to Our New Prime Minister
Shifting Foundations
Putrefaction
Yes, There Is An Alternative
Post-meltdown
Meltdown
Rescuing the New Zealand Economy
Unesco Appointment for Bryan Gould
Don't Leave It To The Bankers
Was Gordon Brown's Reputation Justified?
Universities "More Than Just Agents of Economic Development"
New Appointments for Bryan Gould
New Labour - Not Labour
The End of New Labour?
So Much for Liquidity - Now Let's Have a Serious Approach to Inflation
What Should Gordon Brown Do Now?
A Fibre Optic Network - Twenty Years Earlier
Let's Hear It For The Macro Economy
Beaches - for Cars or People?
Bryan Gould to Chair FORST
A Brown Study
Why Democracy? Bryan Gould Writes for The Observer
Rogue Markets
Bryan Gould's Submission to Select Committee Inquiry Into Monetary Policy
Bryan Gould on Gordon Brown
Needless Casualties in the Economic War
C'llr Magazine
The Roger Awards
The Beginning of the End of the Road
My Vision for New Zealand
British Labour in 2007
Yes, There Is An Alternative
Why Are Interest Rates Not Working?
The Globalisation Bell Tolls for us All
Global Warming and Market Failure
About Bryan Gould
The Democracy Sham
The View from Ohiwa (Blog)
Contact Me
Implications of the Euro
Rates Reform
Tony Blair's Easy Options
How Has Labour Done?

With inflation falling, a full percentage point cut in interest rates at the end of the month now looks like a done deal.  But while a relaxation of monetary policy is both welcome and overdue, it does not remotely measure up to what is now required if we are to ward off what could be the most serious recession in most people’s lifetimes.

That isn’t to say that home owners should not see some small reduction in their mortgage interest payments.  Businesses – at least those still willing to borrow – should get marginally better deals from those lenders still willing and able to lend.  And lower rates should mean that overseas speculators are less likely to push up the value of our dollar by chasing the interest rate premium we have insisted on offering them over recent years.

Even so, the impact of the Reserve Bank governor’s expected decision will be pretty marginal.  Any slight easing in the cost and availability of credit at home will be offset by the higher cost and greater difficulty our banks will encounter in borrowing overseas.   And even if credit is a little cheaper and easier, that may not be of much use if fears of a recession mean that people are no longer willing to borrow and spend.  Relying on monetary policy in these circumstances is a bit like pushing on a piece of string.

When Treasury advised the government a week or two ago that the economic situation had worsened over the three weeks of the Christmas break, they revealed themselves as the only observers who failed to see – from some months back – that a further and rapid deterioration was inevitable.  The suspicion must be that they are still fighting the last war, still fondly hoping that the measures that were too late to deal with last year’s home-grown recession – already well entrenched long before the global meltdown - will now serve to deal with the world crisis.  Following along in the wake of events, relying on tax cuts planned last year and a belated cut in interest rates, will simply not cut the mustard now that the world economy is in free fall.

It is of course true that we have not so far had to grapple with the financial crisis that has engulfed much of the world’s banking system.  Our (largely Australian) banks have so far avoided those problems, though they may find the going gets tougher over coming months.  But what we haven’t seemed to have grasped is that the shattering loss of confidence in the world’s banks is now spilling over in to the real world economy – the one where people actually live and work and spend and try to make a living.

 As recession gathers pace overseas, we have yet to feel the full impact of export markets that are going backwards, of commodity prices that are falling, of import prices that are rising, of credit from overseas sources (on which – as proportionately the world’s second most indebted nation – we are dangerously dependent) becoming more difficult and expensive to arrange.

Nor have we understood the impact on our domestic economy of falling house prices, rising unemployment, tighter government spending levels and more bankruptcies, closures and bad debts.  As people feel less wealthy – as the perceived value of their assets falls, and doubts grow over their future income levels and job security – they become less likely to spend and invest, compounding the recessionary impact of the meltdown overseas.

This is not to say that there is an easy consensus about what does need to be done.  But what is clear is that most overseas governments, with varying degrees of reluctance, have accepted that simply cutting the cost of credit when people may not wish or be able to borrow is not the answer.  What is now needed, as Keynes recognised 75 years ago, is a fiscal stimulus that will raise the actual level of spending in the economy.  That means government investment in infrastructure and services that will benefit the economy, and possibly putting money into the pockets of people – like the poor and the retired – who will spend it, even if this means temporarily rising government deficits.

While others have accepted that difficult times require special measures, we seem locked into an ideological straitjacket which is obsessed with monetary policy and seems more frightened of a burgeoning government deficit than of national bankruptcy.  Yet there is no reason why we should be less courageous than others in making our response to recession. The one bright spot in our economic situation, after all, is that the government’s finances are, by comparison with other countries, reasonably healthy.  We must hope that our new government will have the courage to recognise this, to understand what they must now do, and to do it before it is too late.

Bryan Gould

21 January 2009

 

This article was published in the Sunday Star-Times on 25 January.

 

 

Enter content here

Enter content here

Enter content here